Jump to content

User talk:JJMC89

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
Bot operator top icon
This user is a Wikimedia steward.
This user has signed the confidentiality agreement for access to nonpublic personal data.
This user is a member of the Wikimedia Volunteer Response Team.
Identified as a precious editor on 12 February 2017
This user has email notifications enabled.
This user uses the name JJMC89 on IRC.
JJMC89's page on GitHub
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user has opted out of talkbacks

Template:Party shading/Conservative (Canada)/block has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Party shading/Liberal/block[edit]

Template:Party shading/Liberal/block has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is User:JJMC89 bot/Wikidata external link template parameter removal still active?[edit]

Is User:JJMC89 bot/Wikidata external link template parameter removal still active? Just found Category:Templates whose data is currently being migrated to Wikidata and noticed it had entries from 2016 and 2022 there. Gonnym (talk) 19:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonnym: I can still run it if someone lists a request. No has made one since 2016 though. The 2016 ones should all be on the request page as not done since there was nothing to remove. The ones from 2022 were never requested. — JJMC89 20:03, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was just wondering as I stumbled on the requests on the talk pages (like Template talk:National Pipe Organ Register#National Pipe Organ Register) should these usages of {{Wikidata property migration}} be removed? Gonnym (talk) 21:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ideally, yes. You'll see I removed the 2016 ones previously. — JJMC89 21:31, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The bot and old CfDs[edit]

Hi JJMC89. I saw the bot delete a category based on a 2011 CfD. Is that desirable? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:52, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Firefangledfeathers: I prefer admins to delete the category themselves for G4 so that that the deletion log notes G4, which is what Extraordinary Writ did. Using the bot to empty the category, as Pppery did, isn't an issue. — JJMC89 05:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the explanation! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 05:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]