User talk:TheBrowniess

This is TheBrowniess's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gauda conquest of Kamarup (May 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gauda conquest of Kamarup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheBrowniess! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Independence Day (Haiti) has been accepted[edit]

Independence Day (Haiti), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Federal Alliance of Eastern Sudan has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Federal Alliance of Eastern Sudan. Thanks! Grabup (talk) 08:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow that was quick. I'll see what I can do in terms of expanding the draft though there doesn't seem to be any more reliable sources left relating to FEAS. Anyways, thanks! TheBrowniess (talk) 09:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Grabup! I've expanded the draft a bit, what are your thoughts on it now? Cheers! TheBrowniess (talk) 10:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheBrowniess, Sources does’t establishing notablity. Submit it after citing more independent reliable sources, thanks. Grabup (talk) 10:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welp seems this one's a dud as well. All the sources I got were just those four sadly. Thanks anyways for your speedy reviews! TheBrowniess (talk) 11:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Federal Alliance of Eastern Sudan (May 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grabup was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Federal Alliance of Eastern Sudan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Grabup (talk) 10:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Federal Alliance of Eastern Sudan has been accepted[edit]

Federal Alliance of Eastern Sudan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation Distant Runner has been accepted[edit]

Operation Distant Runner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 02:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HELL YEAHHHH TheBrowniess (talk) 02:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coup attempt articles[edit]

Hey, I love what you're doing with the creation of pages regarding early 2000's and 2010's coup attempts. However, could you add infoboxes to the articles so the information looks more streamlined and easier to digest at a glance? Jebiguess (talk) 23:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll see what I can do. TheBrowniess (talk) 06:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jebiguess Done. Forgive me if I made any mistakes, I'm not experienced with making infoboxes after all. TheBrowniess (talk) 07:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like, I'll add some for you and you can check the source code, copy and paste it, and just edit stuff out depending on the context. Otherwise, just go to Template -> Infobox battle (this is generally the best one for coup attempts that turn violent) and then fill in the information. Jebiguess (talk) 00:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I did, pretty much! If you have the time, you can check out the recent changes I made on the articles and review them regarding the infoboxes. TheBrowniess (talk) 16:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]